Along with software companies reporting good fourth quarter results and M&A and IPO activity heating up, we are seeing a renewed interest this first quarter of 2004 in re-evaluating business models. Inside Sales is once again figuring prominently in the re-engineering of sales strategies to achieve efficient, cost-effective and rapid growth in both start-ups and multi-million dollar enterprises. With more companies recruiting for newly-created inside sales positions, compensation plays a key role in attracting the best-qualified professionals.
Our 2004 Inside Sales Compensation Report shows how our survey respondents are responding to increasing competition for the best candidates. Many companies reported using recruiters again for these positions.
Each year, in order to stay on top of the latest trends, Phone Works collects and compiles data from SF Bay Area technology firms. Representatives of those firms are invited to participate either through an online survey or by filling out a written form. Over 40% of respondents are members of the Telebusiness Alliance, an organization of inside sales professionals representing leading technology companies in the SF Bay Area. The following describes the companies that participated in the survey:
Every year we struggle with the industry’s lack of standardization when it comes to inside sales titles. Even the term “telebusiness” has fallen out of use and seems to have been replaced by “Inside Sales” as a catch-all for all functions. Thus, we have renamed our survey to keep up with the times.
Because titles can vary greatly from company to company, comparisons can be challenging. Our classifications fundamentally distinguish between those groups that generate leads and those that generate revenue. Our guide to titles will not only help you understand our survey and its conclusions but also give you a heads up on what’s “in” and what’s “out”.
| Sales Development Results | |||
| Title | Base Salary | Total Package | Total Package % Change from 2002 |
| Sales Development Representative | Average: $50K Range: $35-75K |
Average: $84K Range: $60-100K |
Up 10% |
| Senior Sales Development Representative | Average: $70K Range: $65-85k |
Average: $100K Range: $90-125K |
Up 10% |
| Sales Development Manager | Average: $75k Range: $45-103k |
Average: $138k Range: $90-160k |
0% Change |
| Directors | Average: $102k Range: $53-140k |
Average: $167k Range: $100-180k |
|
The survey data showed us some key Sales Development compensation trends. They include:
The majority of frustrations cited were related to the elements of the compensation plan that are tied to actions that the group does not control. Given the nature of the group, they are beholden to the Field or Telesales to “take a lead and run with it” once it is passed. Most common challenges reported were:
| Telesales Results | |||
| Title | Base Salary | Total Package | Total Package % Change from 2002 |
| Telesales Representative | Average: $53K Range: $45-60K |
Average: $105K Range: $72-150K |
Up 1% |
| Senior Telesales Representative | Average: $55K Range: $50-75K |
Average: $117K Range: $76-130K |
Up 3% |
| Telesales Manager | Average: $88k Range: $51-110k |
Average: $154k Range: $76-200k |
Down 7% |
| Directors | Average: 102k Range: $53-140k |
Average: $167k Range: $100-180k |
|
While compiling the survey data for telesales departments, we spotted the following trends:
As with challenges reported with Sales Development compensation management, most frustrations in Telesales have to do with the parts of the plan that are out of a rep’s individual control. If a Telesales rep’s quota is dependent on other Telesales or Field reps performing, it is possible for that rep to have outstanding performance and still not make her or his quota. Another issue that was raised repeatedly was the timing of the commission payout. Sales reps’ motivation can lag if a commission is delayed due to a late-paying customer. In summary, the challenges most often reported are:
You can reach Phone Works at 510.749.9073.